Wednesday, July 29, 2015

A DAY UNDER THE SIGN OF PARADOX FOR LENR- JUL 29 2015

A QUOTATION BY PROF. ANDREW MEULENBERG:

"We are more limited by what we know too well than by what we do not know." Most physicists 'know' that CF cannot be nuclear, therefore they can ignore the facts and, in many cases, they try to 'suppress' the 'heresy'. Engineers and chemists are more practical. If shown that something can work, engineers can make it work better and chemists will often find a different (perhaps better) way of doing it."


It is probable not an answer to my editorial of yesterday because it was published a few days before it, however I know some cases in which the echo of an ide was heard before the idea itself.

Extended studies show incontrovertibly that LENR is much too complex, too new, too rich, unexpected, complex, diversified, too messy, overly dynamic and multi-facetted to be understood and solved (as energy source) by Physicists  And physicists, especially nuclear physicists are firmly convinced that LENR belongs to them and only to them.  
It is a paradox: physicists are not good and not 'broad' enough for LENR but own it.
The majority still tries to kill LENR  based on ideological reasons a nice, goodwilled 
minority tries to develop it with insufficient means.  LENR must be first converted ina technologically viable form to be understood and made useful at the heigth of its  Earth changing potential. LENR is so much more than physics only!

My editorial of yesterday was in great lines a fiasco.  My message:

"Damn the theories, full speed ahead with the technological research" 

was not understood well- there is no other option because technologically underdeveloped forms of LENR are also not controlable, not manageable  and will not deliver the experimental data that are absolutely necessary for building the group of theories that describe what we call today LENR.
It is again a paradox related to the first one. Of Catch 22 type (defined so "a requirement that cannot be met until a prerequisite requirement is met, however, the prerequisite cannot be obtained until the original requirement is met.)
"correct understanding of LENR can be attained  only after technological development which must be developed only on basis of prior correct understanding"

Today Andrea Rossi has revealed a third paradox: the e-Cat can operate byond the melting temperature of nickel! Till now we "knew" that melting of nickel stops the process, this being good for the safety. Now we hear the contrary; does it mean that the reactions can take place in molten metal too? (I hope it is not about some say tungsten islands on a sea of Ni).


DAILY NEWS

1) Rossi on Hot Cat [Update No 5] 1350 C for 10 hours Self-sustaining 80% of the time(First Model Now Broken)
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/07/28/rossis-hot-cat-hopes/


Andrea Rossi
July 28th, 2015 at 4:01 PM

Gerry Carillon:
We reached 1380°C and resisted for about 10 hours at that temperature, of which 8 hours in ssm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.


2) Rossi: E-Cat can operate beyond melting point of nickel

Rossi was asked: 
Italo R.
July 29th, 2015 at 2:00 AM
Dear Dr Rossi, as we know the melting temperature of the nickel is 1455 ° C.
I wonder if this is the maximum possible temperature of reactor operation or if, under special conditions, this temperature can be overcome (still working well), without destructive hot spots.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.

and he has answered: 
Andrea Rossi
July 29th, 2015 at 7:23 AM

Italo R.:
We can overcome that limit, for reasons I am not allowed to explain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

3) Seventh International Conference on Future Energy

5) This Blog seems to like my blog, especially my friend AXIL's modern creative thinking;
http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=86497


AXIL EXPLAINS

The cluster fusion description overview in a nutshell.

1. a chemical super critical process or arc discharge produces Rydberg matter based nano particles from an alkali metal including hydrogen, potassium and/or lithium . 

2. nanoparticles produce surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) when they aggregate under electrostatic attraction.

3. Dark mode SPPs are EMF rotating black holes.

4. These EMF black holes are Bose condensates of SPPs (a soliton).

5. SPP black holes produce entangled Hawking radiation, This coherent radiation are photons entangled with the SPP soliton.

6. Entangled Hawking radiation entangle atoms just outside of the SPP. These atoms join the SPP BEC ensemble.

7. A process of fusion of these entangled atoms occurs whereby the energy of this fusion(s) event is absorbed by the SPP BEC. This energy is transferred to the SPP BEC via a special kind of multiply connected wormhole connecting the fusion events to the SPP BEC. What triggers the fusion of the entangled atoms is not known. It might be the probabilistic resolution of quantum superposition between the entangled atoms and the SPP soliton.

8. As the SPP BEC gathers and increases its energy content over time, the SPP BEC will eventually reach a energy storage limit and explode when its size of the soliton grows beyond 100 microns. This is called a Bosenova. These explosions release the energy stored in the SPP soliton which contains both electrons and photons (soft x-ray and extreme ultraviolet) from the SPP BEC. 

This theory explains how LENR experiments having observed up to 10^13 DD Rydberg matter based fusion events can occur in a few nanoseconds. 



OTHER

I have explained you yesterday  my history with the Motivational Literature- very important if we consider that (as I believe it) the Theory of Management in broad sense is the new Philosophy.
This is good Motivational Literature: https://thinksuccessworkshop.com/optin#
John C. Maxwell going to reveal the 10 thinking practices that set apart highly successful people. We need many highly successful LENR-ists!
  1. Big Picture Thinking
  2. Creative Thinking
  3. Realistic Thinking 
  4. Strategic Thinking
  5. Possibility Thinking
  6. Reflective Thinking
  7. Popular Thinking
  8. Shared Thinking 
  9. Unselfish Thinking 
  10. Bottom Line Thinking


No comments:

Post a Comment